Like many women who are also human beings, I’ve been following the
twists and turns of the “War on Women” meme for weeks now, wondering
what the heck it is we’re all meant to be fighting about. It seems that some women are worried
that a President Mitt Romney and Republican Congress would—as they have
promised—move against fair pay for equal work, toss between 14 and 27
million people off Medicaid (of whom about two-thirds are women), cut child care, health care, and food assistance
for about 20 million children, defund Planned Parenthood, do away with
Title X, and maybe seat a Supreme Court willing to reverse Roe v. Wade.
Republican women, in their defense, argue that these and other
legislative initiatives don’t constitute a war on women, so much as a
difference in philosophy, or as 14 Republican Congresswomen put it yesterday in Politico:
“We don’t see our lives as a product of government handouts. In fact,
we resent the idea that we owe our success to bureaucrats, and not our
own initiative.” As the writers conclude, “We have a right to be
self-confident, and we have a right to be suspicious of politicians who
say we should be dependent on government programs.”
But what’s so striking about so many of the GOP initiatives that
implicate women this year is that they betray not a deep suspicion of
“politicians who say we should be dependent on government programs,” but
rather a deep suspicion of other women. Underpinning virtually every
changed rule and policy, every effort to defund and repeal, lies an
argument about the ways in which women are trying to defraud the
government and simply can’t be trusted.
