Obama ousts Gen. McChrystal over remarks

WASHINGTON — President Obama ousted his top commander in Afghanistan on Wednesday after officials determined that comments he and his staff made in a Rolling Stone magazine article amounted to insubordination.

The decision to remove Army Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal puts the war effort in Afghanistan in a precarious position. Obama announced that Gen. David Petraeus will take over as commander in Afghanistan.

But officials concluded that keeping McChrystal in
his job was not viable after he and his staff were quoted making
comments that denigrated U.S. civilian leaders who oversee the war
effort.

The remarks in Rolling Stone angered the White House
and deeply displeased top Defense officials, who have insisted
repeatedly that military officers must respect civilian leadership and
keep their advice and views private.

McChrystal crafted the counterinsurgency plan
adopted by Obama that entailed a sharp increase in troops and shift in
strategy to emphasize protecting the Afghan public and improving the
Afghan government’s performance.

But some officials in the administration, most notably Vice President Joe Biden,
have advocated different approaches, preferring a strategy that
requires fewer troops while emphasizing the elimination of militant
leaders and ensuring Afghanistan does not fall under insurgent control.

McChrystal has served as top commander for only a year, replacing Gen. David McKiernan, who was fired by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates.

By ousting his Afghanistan commander for insubordination, the clash between Obama and McChrystal becomes the most high-profile firing since 1951, when President Truman fired Gen. Douglas MacArthur, who was leading international forces in the Korean War.

In 2008, Adm. William J. Fallon was forced to resign as head of Central Command for comments he made in an Esquire magazine article which were interpreted as disrespecting the Bush administration’s policies in the Middle East.

Because McChrystal has direct control of forces in Afghanistan at a crucial time in war, his removal is seen as more significant.

Any military leader who steps in now to replace him
faces a struggle to mark progress according to the strict timetable
laid out by the White House. A planned U.S. troop reduction is scheduled to begin in a little more than a year.

But the war is widely perceived as going badly. The
military has struggled to create a viable local government following an
offensive in the southern Afghan village of Marja. And the timetable
for the next offensive in Kandahar has been prolonged because of skepticism from local officials.

———

(c) 2010, Tribune Co.

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.