
The vote, which sends the bill to Obama for his
signature, not only was a historic triumph for gay rights, but it sets
the stage for gays to serve openly in the military for the first time.
It was lauded as “one of those moments in our
history when we stepped up and squared our policies with the values
this nation was founded on,” said Senate Majority Leader
Obama left no doubt he will push to implement the new policy.
“By ending ‘don’t ask, don’t tell,’ no longer will
our nation be denied the service of thousands of patriotic Americans
forced to leave the military, despite years of exemplary performance,
because they happen to be gay,” he said. “And no longer will many
thousands more be asked to live a lie in order to serve the country
they love.”
Obama’s signature will not mean instant repeal, but Defense Secretary
“Once this legislation is signed into law by the president, the
will immediately proceed with the planning necessary to carry out this
change carefully and methodically, but purposefully,” he said after the
vote.
The effort will be led by Dr.
Under the legislation, Gates explained, repeal will
take effect once the president, the secretary of Defense and the
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certify that implementation of
the new policies and regulations written by the department “is
consistent with the standards of military readiness, military
effectiveness, unit cohesion, and recruiting and retention of the Armed
Forces.”
The
The
On the final vote, eight Republicans —
an eight-month study of more than 115,000 military personnel, 70
percent said ending the ban on gays serving openly would have a
positive or neutral impact.
But combat unit personnel were more skeptical, as 58 percent of Marines and 48 percent of
respondents said ending the ban would have negative consequences. A
substantial minority also said repeal could affect morale, training and
whether they would stay in the military. Marines voiced the loudest
opposition, the survey found.
Opponents said the survey illustrates why the policy should not be overturned.
“There will be high fives all over the liberal
bastions of America, and we’ll see (on) the talk shows tomorrow, a
bunch of people talking about how great it is,” said Sen.
And military personnel are contacting him and saying of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” “it isn’t broke and don’t fix it,” he said.
Other skeptical senators charged that the vote, which interrupted a lengthy debate over a new nuclear arms treaty with
“This is a political issue, an issue to accommodate a group of supporters of the other side of the aisle,” said Sen.
Supporters argued that overturning the ban was long overdue.
“It is the right thing to do,”
serve and sacrifice for their country have to sacrifice their integrity
to do so. We will be a better military as a result. “
“This is the only law in America today that mandates someone be fired just because of who they are,” said former Air Force Maj.
Repeal backers got strong support from a lot of senators.
“If you care about national security, if you care
about our military readiness, you will repeal this corrosive policy,”
said Sen.
A series of conflicting court rulings made it
difficult, if not impossible, for the military to keep up and properly
abide by the law. In October, a
appeals court ruled to reinstate “don’t ask, don’t tell” after a
federal district court judge found it unconstitutional and issued a
worldwide stay of the law a week earlier.
In response to the legal bickering, Gates issued an order saying only top civilian
leaders could force a service member out of the military under “don’t
ask, don’t tell.” Since that change, no one has been kicked out of the
military under the policy.
But supporters wanted more legal backup.
“In the end, the Constitution charges the
with setting military policy and the executive branch with implementing
it,” said Kirk. “As a 21-year Navy Reserve officer, I believe it is
important for military leaders, not federal judges, to run our armed
forces.”
———
(c) 2010, McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
Visit the