Movies can be like wine: Once uncorked, they don’t often last long on the shelf. But
Just six weeks before director
October, Paramount Pictures pulled the Leonardo DiCaprio-starring movie
from its year-end lineup.
Although “
television spots hadn’t yet started running, the film’s trailer and
movie theater cardboard standees had been shipped, only to be quickly
altered with the new release date. The publicity campaign was well
underway too: The Cold War-era movie had been featured in numerous fall
preview pieces, and was turning up in early Oscar prediction stories.
The nearly five-month stay was prompted by a number of financial reasons and knocked “
out of the current Academy Awards race. Though such postponements can
be calamitous — Universal changed the release date for “The Wolfman”
three times, and the troubled remake opened to middling reviews and
ticket sales last weekend — the delay for the far more critically
acclaimed “
“If you have a bad movie, and you delay it, they
pounce on you,” says one of the film’s producers, Mike Medavoy. “But if
you have a good movie, and you delay it, you can get over it.”
Some incredibly successful films — “Titanic,” “Star Trek” and “
from their initial premiere dates for various reasons and scarcely
suffered.
and cannibalism are such perfect partners), it can duplicate that
film’s commercial and critical appeal. (It’s not the only tie to
Audience tracking surveys show that the
is generating strong “definite interest” — 40 percent and higher — from
all four slices of the moviegoing population: men and women young and
old alike. “It’s very rare that you get a movie with all four quadrants
that high, especially for an R-rated movie,” says
The story follows U.S. Marshal
complicated puzzles — on a remote island housing the criminally insane.
The movie was not particularly easy to get made, and passed through several incarnations, with
“The book is a descent into a state of mind,” screenwriter
audience member experience the pressure of what it feels like to
descend into insanity.”
Scorsese says he was attracted by how the plot both
indulged in, and then wreaked havoc with, the conventions of narrative
storytelling. “Who is the narrator? What does he really know?” the
director says.
DiCaprio, who is collaborating with Scorsese for the fourth time (“The Departed,” “The Aviator,” “Gangs of
mostly related to the costs of releasing the film theatrically in the
fourth quarter while not being able to collect its DVD income until
2010.
Around the same time, the studio was releasing
“The Lovely Bones,” which initially looked like it might be an Oscar
contender (it has but one nomination, for supporting actor
Given how strong “
is the only new film in wide release this weekend — the movie is likely
to establish new opening records for both Scorsese and DiCaprio.
The director’s previous best premiere came with 2006’s best picture winner “The Departed,” which grossed
in its first three days. Even though DiCaprio starred in “Titanic,” his
best opening was 2002’s “Catch Me if You Can,” which grossed
The trickier question is whether awards voters will remember “
Scorsese says “I really don’t know” if the film’s
delay will have any impact. “I go by what they really feel is
important,” he says of
—
(c) 2010, Los Angeles Times.
Visit the Los Angeles Times on the Internet at http://www.latimes.com/
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.