Even at the height of the day, the skies in many parts of northern Iraq are dark as the Islamic State (ISIS) torches oil wells and oil-filled defensive trenches in its retreat.
Artillery fire and bombing raids by U.S. aircraft and others battling ISIS are also causing conflagrations at oil installations.
Aid teams near the town of Qayyarah, about 80 kilometers (50 miles) south of the ISIS stronghold of Mosul, talk of escaping civilians being covered in oil residues.
“Everywhere is covered in a fine dusting of black soot and grime,” one aid worker from the Save the Children charity told the BBC.
“And the children we met were covered in it — their hands were black, their feet were black and their hair was matted … they were coming out in rashes, developing problems with their lungs.”
Deliberate pollution
There are fears that as ISIS comes under ever greater pressure it will unleash “scorched earth” tactics, setting alight ever more oil wells and deliberately polluting the waters of the Tigris and Euphrates, two of the region’s main rivers, which supply water and power to millions.
Setting oil fields alight could also have wider climate-related consequences.
During Saddam Hussein’s invasion and subsequent retreat from Kuwait in 1990/91, the Iraqis set alight nearly 800 Kuwaiti oil wells: at one stage — in March 1991 — it was calculated that up to 6 million barrels of oil were being burned each day.
The result was daytime darkness and long plumes of black smoke across a wide area of the Gulf.
Though the long-term impact of Kuwait’s oil fires on the climate is still being assessed, the release of vast amounts of climate-changing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere is considered to have added to the problems of warming, on both a regional and a global scale.
The Gulf region is one of the fastest-warming in the world, with many areas forecast to be uninhabitable in the not too distant future because of higher temperatures and chronic water shortages.
Long-term damage
Pollution from the Kuwait oil fires and ruptured oil pipelines are also believed to have caused serious long-term damage to the waters of the Gulf.
There are fears that, with pressure on the group mounting, similar developments could unfold in northern Iraq as ISIS torches oil installations 25 years later.
In recent years Iraq has been trying to ramp up its oil production in order to raise more revenues — partly to fund the war against ISIS.
But much of the development of Iraq’s fossil fuel resources has been badly planned and mismanaged.
The World Bank says that, globally, approximately 140 billion cubic meters (4.9 billion mcf) of natural gas produced together with oil are burned or flared off each year — adding 350 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere.
Iraq is now one of the world’s leading gas-flaring countries: a lack of pipelines and infrastructure means that its gas is mostly burned off. Meanwhile the country has been forced to import large amounts of gas from neighboring Iran in order to meet its energy needs.
Across northern Iraq and eastern Syria — the country’s main oil-producing region — ISIS controls large numbers of oil wells and derives considerable income from selling fossil fuels on the black market.
A lack of maintenance and expertise means that many of these installations are a hazard to the environment. Badly-run oil facilities also cause considerable human suffering.
A recent report by Pax, a Netherlands-based church grouping, says that more than 5,700 makeshift oil refineries are operating in the ISIS-controlled Deir ez-Zor area of Syria.
Thousands of civilians, many of them children, are forced to work at these crude, basically-run facilities.
“From exploding fuel barrels to exposure to carcinogenic chemicals and inhalational toxins, these makeshift oil refineries will have a long-lasting health impact on communities and their environment,” the report says.
— Climate News Network
Wonder why these things are happening over there in the MiddleEast ?
Remember KinkyFriedman, “the Texas Jew-boy” rock-n’-roller? A proficient thinker, Friedman recently stated in an interview = “Obama’s leaving in a few months, I don’t have much to say about Him. Except that He’s really turned out to be a ForrestGump. He peaked when He was a candidate. He was a good candidate, & if He’d have let it go there, He’d have been fine. But He’s been the worst president, unbelievably weak. I think He reached His zenith when He took that series of selfies at NelsonMandela’s funeral. That kind of says it all. I think He knows Mandela was great man, & He knows He’s nothing but the party puke.
“All you have to do is look to theMiddleEast. I mean I know most Americans don’t care about foreign-policy & all that, but just look to the rest of the world & see what the world looks like without America. That’s what Obama has done.”