In a shift, the home entertainment company is in
advanced negotiations to acquire “House of Cards,” a political drama
series starring and produced by Oscar-winner
Should the deal close, it would represent
has succeeded primarily as a distributor of previously released movies
and television series and has more than 20 million subscribers. Now,
instead of selling established content, it wants to get into the
riskier game of hawking its own original fare.
If
goes forward, it could be the most prominent test of whether a
traditional multimillion-dollar star-laden show can succeed on an
Internet platform where people watch when they please and may only
learn about the show if a computer algorithm recommends it. Unlike
traditional broadcast and cable networks,
“House of Cards,” a remake of a 1990 British miniseries, won’t come cheap.
that call for the company to commit to 26 episodes of the show at a
cost of tens of millions of dollars. Most striking is that as part of
the deal being discussed, MRC would not have to make a test episode or
pilot, according to people close to the talks.
That was enough to send
HBO running to the exits. The pay-TV channel had kicked the tires on
“House of Cards,” but going forward with no pilot was a deal killer,
people familiar with the network’s thinking said.
As recently as January,
company. “We think that we’re better off letting other people take
creative risks and get the rewards,” he said on a conference call with
analysts.
The change in direction for
comes as it faces escalating costs to acquire content and hold onto the
rights it currently has. The most significant challenge it faces, many
analysts agree, will be renewing its pact with the pay-cable channel
Starz, which gives it access to recent releases from Walt Disney
Studios and
Janney Capital Markets analyst
has become a prominent buyer of Internet streaming rights, committing
billions of dollars in recent multiyear deals with distributors Epix —
the cable network with rights to movies from Paramount Pictures,
Lionsgate and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer — as well as with
and Relativity Media. Going into original programming could also mean a
new buyer for content, which would also be good news for the studios.
On the other hand,
“It’s hard to see how that kind of economics can fit into a service that charges
Some industry analysts fear that
“They could be paying a very high price tag for content that does not find an audience,” said
“
is used to paying for stuff that’s valued-based on how the market has
already responded to it,” observed Wible. “In the world of production
you increase the risk, but also the reward.”
Interestingly, a person close to the company said
unlike other programmers, is not interested in being involved in the
creative process of making content, including casting and scripts. That
is another alarm bell for some.
“If you bring a show to HBO you get people that have helped create hits and know what they’re doing,” Martin said.
———
(c) 2011, Los Angeles Times.
Visit the Los Angeles Times on the Internet at http://www.latimes.com/.
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.