The catchphrase that Obama used in his inaugural
address to describe his vision for the American economy looks to have
been retired. In its place is the forward-looking exhortation: “Win the
future.”
Obama rolled out the new slogan at a routine visit to a community college in
The final score at evening’s end: nine references to winning the future; goose egg for “new foundation.”
When it works, a pithy presidential slogan is a
powerful communicative tool, helping distill complex policies in ways
the public can easily grasp. If nothing else, it should be memorable.
But “new foundation” never seeped into the popular culture.
“You don’t know what that is,” said
a Democratic strategist. “You need another phrase to explain what the
‘new foundation’ is for. But everyone can kind of understand what
‘winning the future’ means.”
Obama’s last reference to the “new foundation” came way back on
“It reminds me of the old days when women wore foundation garments —
girdles. So when he said, ‘new foundation,’ I thought, ‘Oh my God!
Those girdles!’ “
Before it disappeared from the presidential lexicon, though, “new foundation” got quite a workout.
Obama invoked it 100 times as president, according to the
In an appearance at
Obama came up with the phrase on his own. An aide
said that while editing the inaugural address, Obama suggested it as a
way to capture his vision for where he wanted to take the country.
As it turns out, he wasn’t the first president to give “new foundation” a whirl.
“Doonesbury” then got into the act, lampooning the former president. The popular cartoon strip showed a picture of the
Girdles, unsteady houses — the phrase evokes images that neither Carter nor Obama intended.
Presidents and Their Speechwriters,” said that Carter aides were
casting about for a catch phrase akin to
foundation” at the State of the Union address, Carter promptly dropped
it, Schlesinger said.
Given Carter’s record as a one-term president who
presided over high unemployment and an energy crisis, Schlesinger said
he was surprised Obama would echo what he called “a Carter-ism.”
“They have enough bright people in the
Now it seems the new formulation is in place.
Speaking to commentator
Elaborating, he said: “And they don’t like the
process and they felt that our focus wasn’t on what they’re focused on,
which is how to win the future.”
———
(c) 2011, Tribune Co.
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.